Skip to Main Content
Railroad News

One Fatality and Two Seriously Injured at Dangerous, Unguarded CSX Crossing

By Pottroff & Karlin LLC |

(Fort Branch, Indiana – August 6, 2013)

Police were closely guarding the identities of three victims, one a fatality, of a Tuesday morning collision between a CSX freight train and a minivan at the dangerous, unguarded crossing of Gibson County Road West 550 South and CSX rails just north of Fort Branch, IN. The collision occurred at about 9:30 A.M. late Tuesday afternoon. Later in the day, confirmation of the death of four-year-old Andrea Bullock by Gibson County Coroner Barrett Doyle was made as well as identification of the driver, the victim’s father, John Bullock, 49, who was still a patient at Deaconess Hospital in Evansville, IN. A second child, still unnamed, was treated and released after treatment at Deaconess.  The family is from Princeton, IN.

As previously mentioned, this incident happened at a dangerous, unguarded crossing. It is virtually certain that lights and gates would have prevented this incident. Both CSX and Operation Lifesaver know lights and gates are the most effective type of protection at railroad crossings. Studies that have been conducted over fifty years ago confirm that lights and gates offer the ability to drastically reduce the number of vehicle/train accidents by as much as 96%.

One reason for the stealthily slow investigation progress could possibly have been the existence of an earlier fatality that occurred at the same crossing on October 29, 2011, a tragedy which brought neither railroad nor government agency support for the installation of a protective system consisting of flashing lights, bells and crossing gates. Today’s tragedy probably will draw even less interest in protecting the driving public from the average of 29 trains that CSX sends across CRW 550 South each day at a top allowable (determined by the Federal Railroad Administration’s track classification index, not a precaution in regard to the combination of faster trains and local motor vehicle traffic) speed of 60 MPH.

Both the FRA’s Crossing Inventory Guide and Gibson County Sheriff’s Dept. Sgt. Bruce Vanoven confirmed that the crossings only “markings” came in the form of standard, passive railroad crossbuck and highway “stop” signs, designed only to indicate the presence of a railroad crossing, but with no ability whatsoever of giving warning of an approaching train. The railroad’s lone comment came in the form of non-communication, as news media attempts to reach CSX were not returned.

Meanwhile, crossing warnings may have been silent, but not the crossing concerns of nearby residents. “I didn’t see it, (but) I heard it,” testified Dave Robison. “It’s just bad, it’s not good. Another one would be too many. It’s already three more than should have been killed there,” he noted, indicating at least three earlier fatalities he recalled occurring at the intersection.

“They’ve tried for years to get something done about it, but it doesn’t help,” noted another long-time resident as he talked to news reporters. “Sure, arms would help – that would stop people. Even flashing lights would help,” said Vernon Welch, who crosses at the CSX/CR West 550 South crossing daily

His fellow Gibson County resident agreed fully. “They need to put some lights up there,” said Welch.


Railroad News


Train crash cases are unique and complex with many different potential pitfalls, such as federal preemption. Anytime I get hired or even get a call from a train crash victim, my very first call is to Nathan’s firm. Nathan’s knowledge and experience in handling and trying cases against these litigation savvy railroad companies gives me the confidence to know that the clients and cases I refer to him are getting the best of the best.

James Perrin Lubbock, Texas

I have had the opportunity to work as co-counsel with Nathan on several railroad crossing accidents cases. In each case, Nathan always possessed an incredible knowledge of the law and the facts, possessed a great talent for aggressive - strategic legal planning and trial tactics while, at the same time, displaying great skill as an effective negotiator. I would recommend him to anyone without hesitation.

Scott McCluen Harriman, Tennessee

Nathan Karlin has my strongest endorsement in the field of railroad crossing cases and personal injury law. I had the pleasure of working with Nathan in a complex railroad personal injury case. I was impressed by Nathan’s knowledge, his work ethic, and his dedication to the client. I look forward to working with Nathan on future injury matters. I am also aware firsthand that he has obtained excellent trial and settlement results in numerous cases involving members of the public harmed by railroad companies.

Joseph M. Miller Mandeville, Louisiana

Nathan is a warrior fighting the railroads. As a fellow personal injury lawyer, I have constantly been impressed with his depth of knowledge and his capabilities from case to case. I’d take him into battle with me any day against the biggest railroads and insurance companies on the planet.

Jon C. Clark Austin, Texas

Bob Pottroff has fought for the victims of the railroads’ callous disregard for safety more than any other attorney that I know. I should know because I am currently Chair-elect of the Railroad Section of ATLA.

Robert Schuetze Boulder, Colorado

Mr. Pottroff has shaken the rail industry to its very roots. Settlements are now more common as a result of the way he has exposed the industry’s wrongdoing.

Mike Easley Arkansas

Bob Pottroff’s work in railroad safety law is unmatched and he has been the source of great advice and phenomenal creativity.

Roger Brown Jefferson City, Missouri

In addition to his substantive contributions to railroad grade crossing safety, I have personally observed his untiring efforts and contributions to improving the integrity of the legal system.

Elizabeth Hardy Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8