Skip to Main Content
Railroad News

Midland Crossing Tragedy Crossing Signals Get Extended Buffer Time by Union Pacific

By Pottroff & Karlin LLC |

(Midland, Texas – December 21, 2012)

Possibly in an attempt to more accurately and appropriately align flashing lights and gates to their originally designed and approved operational timing at the site of the horrible November 15 tragedy when a Union Pacific freight train struck a flatbed semi-trailer truck being used as a parade float in the annual Midland, TX “Show of Support/Hunt For Heroes” celebration honoring wounded American veterans, UPRR signal crews were at the Garfield Street crossing Friday, adjusting the signal circuits to “improve buffer time” between the activation of the crossing protective devices and the arrival of trains at the crossing.

After the accident, which took the lives of four wounded veterans and injured 16 more participants and spouses, tests by both the National Transportation Safety Board and team of attorneys representing some of the veterans and their wives showed the signals to be marginally compliant with federal regulations, but not with Texas Dept. of Transportation documents which originally authorized installation of the signal protective system in use at the crossing.

In an e-mailed statement to the news media, Union Pacific Spokeswoman Raquel Espinoza said the “improved buffer time” would put warning time at the Midland crossing to “over and above” the minimum warning time required by federal regulations.

In a carefully-worded statement, the UPRR spokeswoman said that “The buffer time is added to further ensure that the signal system always provides the warning time required by federal regulations – as it did the day of the accident.”

Documentation of the original approved signal design and installation provided by TxDOT Rail Division official Darin Kosmack showed that the signals were supposed to give motorists 30 seconds of warning from activation of the flashing signals, dropping of the gates and arrival of a train at the Garfield Street crossing rather than the bare minimum 20 seconds, and that no record of approval of any adjustment of the timing was ever filed.

According to Manhattan, KS-based attorney Bob Pottroff, who is teaming with Lubbock, TX attorney Kevin Glasheen to represent several of the victims and their spouses, Union Pacific’s statement does not address the essential fact that the crossing protective devices should have given at least a 30-second warning. “It continually gives 20 seconds (of warning), and that’s a failure (of the system as designed and approved),” asserted Pottroff.

The plaintiffs’ attorney further explained to the news media that video cameras set up at the scene of the tragedy by his team following the accident showed that eastbound trains (as was the UPRR freight train involved in the collision) give 20 seconds of warning, while westbound trains give nearly 40 seconds. “That means there’s a circuitry issue that needs to be corrected,” he said .The suit filed on behalf of the injured veterans and their spouses charges that Union Pacific failed to provide the reasonable and timely audible and visual warning of the approaching train and failed to provide a safe railroad crossing. In addition, it says that the train did not activate its brakes or otherwise attempt to slow, and that the railroad had not fixed what the suit says are hazardous conditions posed by the road’s grade.


sb-news-bg

Railroad News



Testimonials

Train crash cases are unique and complex with many different potential pitfalls, such as federal preemption. Anytime I get hired or even get a call from a train crash victim, my very first call is to Nathan’s firm. Nathan’s knowledge and experience in handling and trying cases against these litigation savvy railroad companies gives me the confidence to know that the clients and cases I refer to him are getting the best of the best.

James Perrin Lubbock, Texas

I have had the opportunity to work as co-counsel with Nathan on several railroad crossing accidents cases. In each case, Nathan always possessed an incredible knowledge of the law and the facts, possessed a great talent for aggressive - strategic legal planning and trial tactics while, at the same time, displaying great skill as an effective negotiator. I would recommend him to anyone without hesitation.

Scott McCluen Harriman, Tennessee

Nathan Karlin has my strongest endorsement in the field of railroad crossing cases and personal injury law. I had the pleasure of working with Nathan in a complex railroad personal injury case. I was impressed by Nathan’s knowledge, his work ethic, and his dedication to the client. I look forward to working with Nathan on future injury matters. I am also aware firsthand that he has obtained excellent trial and settlement results in numerous cases involving members of the public harmed by railroad companies.

Joseph M. Miller Mandeville, Louisiana

Nathan is a warrior fighting the railroads. As a fellow personal injury lawyer, I have constantly been impressed with his depth of knowledge and his capabilities from case to case. I’d take him into battle with me any day against the biggest railroads and insurance companies on the planet.

Jon C. Clark Austin, Texas

Bob Pottroff has fought for the victims of the railroads’ callous disregard for safety more than any other attorney that I know. I should know because I am currently Chair-elect of the Railroad Section of ATLA.

Robert Schuetze Boulder, Colorado

Mr. Pottroff has shaken the rail industry to its very roots. Settlements are now more common as a result of the way he has exposed the industry’s wrongdoing.

Mike Easley Arkansas

Bob Pottroff’s work in railroad safety law is unmatched and he has been the source of great advice and phenomenal creativity.

Roger Brown Jefferson City, Missouri

In addition to his substantive contributions to railroad grade crossing safety, I have personally observed his untiring efforts and contributions to improving the integrity of the legal system.

Elizabeth Hardy Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Testimonials