Skip to Main Content
Railroad News

Railroad Industry Lobbies Congress to Delay Safety Reforms As NTSB Investigation Advises Otherwise

By Pottroff & Karlin LLC |

(Washington, DC — April 24, 2012)

In the wake of the April 24 release of a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) analysis of a deadly train collision which happened near Red Oak, IA April 17, 2011, the railroad industry, through its Washington-based lobbying group, The Association of American Railroads, is actively attempting to convince Congress to delay the legislated launch of the Positive Train Control System by five years.

The NTSB’s final report on the April, 2011 Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad collision between two freight trains that resulted in the deaths of two BNSF employees and the derailment of two locomotives and 12 freight cars listed employee fatigue as the primary cause of the tragedy, but NTSB Chair Deborah A. P. Hersman and other officials said that the absence of a positive train control system contributed to the accident. PTC systems are designed to identify the rear of a train and to stop an approaching train if a safe braking distance is exceeded.

But almost simultaneously with the NTSB’s report, the AAR, on behalf of the U.S. railroad industry, has been attempting to achieve a delay of the institution of the same system which the NTSB says could have averted the BNSF collision as well as several others, especially the 2008 California catastrophe that killed 25 and seriously injured another 130 when a distracted locomotive engineer missed a red “stop” signal and ran his loaded Los Angeles Metrolink commuter passenger train into a standing Union Pacific freight train. Current legislation calls for a 2015 activation of PTC where trains carry either passengers or hazardous materials, and the railroads want the effective date to be 2020.

While Patti Reilly of the AAR was calling the deadline “unrealistic,” Congressman Bill Shuster, a Pennsylvania Republican who chairs the House subcommittee on Railroads, Pipelines and Explosives claimed that the institution of PTC “is a prime example of regulatory overreach,” and that it’s institution was “not going to make things safer out there.”

Proponents of the safety measure — which experts estimate will cost the railroads over $10 billion to institute — do not want a delay.  Metrolink Board of Directors Chairman Richard Katz calls PTC “probably the most important innovation in railroad safety that will occur in our lifetime.”

NTSB Chair Hersman, speaking at a conference last year, pointed out that “the human is a weak link,” and that “it’s important to have a system designed to be fail safe. PTC will do that.”

The obvious is that railroads continue to balk at responsibility for public and employee safety, placing low priority on the preservation of human life and a high priority on profits.


sb-news-bg

Railroad News



Testimonials

Train crash cases are unique and complex with many different potential pitfalls, such as federal preemption. Anytime I get hired or even get a call from a train crash victim, my very first call is to Nathan’s firm. Nathan’s knowledge and experience in handling and trying cases against these litigation savvy railroad companies gives me the confidence to know that the clients and cases I refer to him are getting the best of the best.

James Perrin Lubbock, Texas

I have had the opportunity to work as co-counsel with Nathan on several railroad crossing accidents cases. In each case, Nathan always possessed an incredible knowledge of the law and the facts, possessed a great talent for aggressive - strategic legal planning and trial tactics while, at the same time, displaying great skill as an effective negotiator. I would recommend him to anyone without hesitation.

Scott McCluen Harriman, Tennessee

Nathan Karlin has my strongest endorsement in the field of railroad crossing cases and personal injury law. I had the pleasure of working with Nathan in a complex railroad personal injury case. I was impressed by Nathan’s knowledge, his work ethic, and his dedication to the client. I look forward to working with Nathan on future injury matters. I am also aware firsthand that he has obtained excellent trial and settlement results in numerous cases involving members of the public harmed by railroad companies.

Joseph M. Miller Mandeville, Louisiana

Nathan is a warrior fighting the railroads. As a fellow personal injury lawyer, I have constantly been impressed with his depth of knowledge and his capabilities from case to case. I’d take him into battle with me any day against the biggest railroads and insurance companies on the planet.

Jon C. Clark Austin, Texas

Bob Pottroff has fought for the victims of the railroads’ callous disregard for safety more than any other attorney that I know. I should know because I am currently Chair-elect of the Railroad Section of ATLA.

Robert Schuetze Boulder, Colorado

Mr. Pottroff has shaken the rail industry to its very roots. Settlements are now more common as a result of the way he has exposed the industry’s wrongdoing.

Mike Easley Arkansas

Bob Pottroff’s work in railroad safety law is unmatched and he has been the source of great advice and phenomenal creativity.

Roger Brown Jefferson City, Missouri

In addition to his substantive contributions to railroad grade crossing safety, I have personally observed his untiring efforts and contributions to improving the integrity of the legal system.

Elizabeth Hardy Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Testimonials