Skip to Main Content
Railroad News

Flashing Lights Were Recommended at Dangerous, Unguarded Norfolk Southern Crossing Where Young Pennsylvania Mother Was Killed

By Pottroff & Karlin LLC |

(Halifax, Pennsylvania – September 28, 2016)

Referring to a fatal rail crossing situation where a local 29-year-old wife and mother was killed in a tragic Labor Day accident at a crossing, a PennLive (Pennsylvania Media Group) news writer has delved into the tragic history of crossing safety neglect by both  the state and the railroad. Demonstrating their mutual histories of choosing the cheaper, rather than the safer option of a private crossing maintained as public access to a public recreational site.

Christine Vendel, a writer for the Harrisburg, PA-based news group, delved into histories of responsibility denial and refusal or delay to produce a safer intersection. She contacted the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission, as well as interviewed railroad safety experts and Pottroff & Karlin, LLC attorneys as she attempted to shine a brighter spotlight upon the neglect which cost the life of the mother of a 3-month-old baby and left Trisha Hoffman’s husband, Cory, of Halifax, PA a grieving widower.

The Fish and Boat Commission took the drastic move of shutting off access to its Susquehanna River-side boat launch ramp on Susquehanna Trail Road just off Highway 147 by closing the deadly, dangerous and unguarded crossing Monday in order “to evaluate the intersection and the railroad crossing” which experts have deemed to have “serious deficiencies.”

“More than 30 years ago, a civil engineer with the railroad company recommended automatic flashing lights at the crossing to account for a wooded area that blocked drivers’ view of oncoming trains,” wrote Ms. Vendel after her utilization of the “Right To Know” requirement of public agencies and officials through study of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission hearing transcripts for several decades.

“But the Fish Commission, which was petitioning for the improved crossing so it could build the boat ramp, rejected the $60,000 flashers,” Reporter Vendel learned, “as unnecessary and too expensive.”

But apparently as consolation, the Fish Commission offered to clear brush and tree growth and install passive railroad cross-buck and highway stop signs, but the signs were installed incorrectly, if at all, and the brush/tree trimming was rarely, if ever, repeated after an initial effort in the 1970’s or 1980’s.

Conrail, the owner of the rail line at the time (Norfolk Southern later acquired the rail line after ConRail’s dissolution), civil engineer Paul Jefferis, Jr. foresaw the maintenance problems presented by one-shot brush trimming and sign placement as major parts of the situation when he recommended flashing lights for the crossing three decades ago. “The limits (of the trees to be cut back) are not shown or who would be responsible to maintain the clearing of this area,” criticized Jefferis of the plan.

“It’s unclear if the stop sign was ever erected,” observed the PennLive reporter, who added that, once trimmed, “but they grew back and currently hug both the access road and tracks, severely limiting drivers’ sight lines to the tracks.”

Talking with two professionals, a professor emeritus of civil and environmental engineering at West Virginia University and an attorney at Pottroff & Karlin, LLC, Vendel got present perspectives on past and current sight distance problems.

“The sight distance at the crossing for vehicles leaving the boat ramp is seriously deficient,” said Professor Emeritus Ronald Eck of WVU.

Fully agreeing was attorney Nathan Karlin of the Pottroff Law Firm, who told Vendel that “Even if she did everything perfectly, this accident might still have happened because of the sight distance.”

The railroad also failed to recognize the serious vulnerability that motorists face at intersections of road and rail intersections like the CSX/Susquehanna Trail Drive crossing.  “The railroad had numerous opportunities to identify deficiencies at the crossing over the years,” Karlin told Vendel, adding that “This lady had one opportunity.”

There were multiple opportunities over the years for the railroad to identify clear deficiencies with the crossing.  “2-person train crews were passing by this crossing at least four times a day, and that’s not counting crossing inspectors and public safety managers. How many people went over there and never identified any problems? That’s the tragedy!”


Railroad News


Train crash cases are unique and complex with many different potential pitfalls, such as federal preemption. Anytime I get hired or even get a call from a train crash victim, my very first call is to Nathan’s firm. Nathan’s knowledge and experience in handling and trying cases against these litigation savvy railroad companies gives me the confidence to know that the clients and cases I refer to him are getting the best of the best.

James Perrin Lubbock, Texas

I have had the opportunity to work as co-counsel with Nathan on several railroad crossing accidents cases. In each case, Nathan always possessed an incredible knowledge of the law and the facts, possessed a great talent for aggressive - strategic legal planning and trial tactics while, at the same time, displaying great skill as an effective negotiator. I would recommend him to anyone without hesitation.

Scott McCluen Harriman, Tennessee

Nathan Karlin has my strongest endorsement in the field of railroad crossing cases and personal injury law. I had the pleasure of working with Nathan in a complex railroad personal injury case. I was impressed by Nathan’s knowledge, his work ethic, and his dedication to the client. I look forward to working with Nathan on future injury matters. I am also aware firsthand that he has obtained excellent trial and settlement results in numerous cases involving members of the public harmed by railroad companies.

Joseph M. Miller Mandeville, Louisiana

Nathan is a warrior fighting the railroads. As a fellow personal injury lawyer, I have constantly been impressed with his depth of knowledge and his capabilities from case to case. I’d take him into battle with me any day against the biggest railroads and insurance companies on the planet.

Jon C. Clark Austin, Texas

Bob Pottroff has fought for the victims of the railroads’ callous disregard for safety more than any other attorney that I know. I should know because I am currently Chair-elect of the Railroad Section of ATLA.

Robert Schuetze Boulder, Colorado

Mr. Pottroff has shaken the rail industry to its very roots. Settlements are now more common as a result of the way he has exposed the industry’s wrongdoing.

Mike Easley Arkansas

Bob Pottroff’s work in railroad safety law is unmatched and he has been the source of great advice and phenomenal creativity.

Roger Brown Jefferson City, Missouri

In addition to his substantive contributions to railroad grade crossing safety, I have personally observed his untiring efforts and contributions to improving the integrity of the legal system.

Elizabeth Hardy Lake Charles, Louisiana

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8